Gibson Les Paul Studio vs Standard vs Epiphone Review

Updated on January 29, 2017
Guitar Gopher profile image

Guitar Gopher is a guitarist and bassist with over 30 years of experience as a musician.

How does the Gibson Les Paul Studio compare to the Gibson Les Paul Standard and Epiphone Les Paul?
How does the Gibson Les Paul Studio compare to the Gibson Les Paul Standard and Epiphone Les Paul?

The Legendary Les Paul

There are few guitars more popular than the Gibson Les Paul. The instrument is an American icon, and the Les Paul sound is a driving force in just about every music genre. They’re made in the USA to extremely high standards of excellence, and Gibson’s attention to craftsmanship shows through in the tone, look and feel of this amazing guitar.

However, such an elite instrument does not come cheap. A new Gibson Les Paul Standard will cost you a big chunk of cash, and that puts the guitar out of reach for many hobbyists and up-and-coming musicians. Make no mistake: A Gibson is worth every penny. But what do you do if you simply don’t have the coin to get yourself a Gibson Les Paul?

You can go the Epiphone route. The Epi Les Paul Standard is an outstanding guitar for the money, and comes in at only a fraction of what you’d spend on a Gibson. But there is another option.

In the 1980’s Gibson decided to produce a version of the Les Paul without all the bindings, inlays and other shiny things that account for some of the cost of a Les Paul Standard. The result was the Gibson Les Paul Studio, a less impressive Les Paul to be sure but still a Les Paul through and through.

Over the years the Studio has improved in quality to the point where it has now become a valid second option for guitarists of any skill level. And at around half of what you’d pay for a Standard, it’s much easier on the budget.

But the Les Paul Studio still comes with a decent price tag, especially compared to the Epiphone. This presents many guitarists with a problem. Do you spend the cash on a Gibson Les Paul Standard, save some money and go with the Epiphone, or split the difference and choose the Les Paul Studio?

In this article we’ll take a look at the Gibson Les Paul Studio vs Standard vs Epiphone Les Paul, and compare these three guitars in construction, sound and value. The right choice for you depends on many factors, but this review should help you figure it all out.

Gibson Les Paul Studio

I suppose I should say form the start that I’m a huge fan of the Les Paul Studio. This is a conclusion I’ve arrived at after three decades of playing guitar, and handling all kinds of Les Pauls from both Gibson and Epiphone, and more than a few copies along the way as well. I firmly believe the Studio is the best value you’ll find in the Les Paul world. At a cost of about half of a Standard Les Paul, and a little more than twice what an Ephiphone runs, cash-wise it’s firmly planted in the middle of the Les Paul controversy.

So what makes the Les Paul Studio such a great value? For starters, the Studio isn’t built overseas in some outsourcing factory like Epiphone. This is a real USA-made Gibson, and that means a lot as far as craftsmanship and attention to detail.

Body Woods and Construction

Like a Gibson Les Paul Standard, the body and neck of the Studio is made of mahogany, and the top is carved maple.

Epiphones, too, have mahogany bodies and necks, but they do not have the same thick maple top as the USA Gibsons. Instead they have a maple veneer, which is more for appearance than sound.

Mahogany is a deep, resonant tonewood, and responsible for the Les Paul growl. But without the maple cap the overall sound can muddy up a bit. You may notice that the Epiphone Les Paul doesn't isn't quite as articulate as the Gibson Les Paul Studio, and this is a big reason why.

Does the Gibson LP Standard have a thicker body than the Studio? This is a subject of much debate, but generally if you’re comparing two guitars from the same year they ought to be close. The Epiphone is noticeably thinner, but the difference between the Gibson Standard and Studio isn’t much to be concerned about.

Fretboard Materials

Fretboard toneood is a touchy subject for Gibson these days. Like many guitar manufacturers, they’ve been tiptoeing their way around some increasingly strict regulations on tonewood imports. Quality rosewood has long been an ingredient for great tone, especially when it comes to fretboards. But high-quality rosewood is getting tougher to find, and Gibson is taking some steps to source other materials.

Epiphones still use rosewood in their fingerboards, but this isn’t the rich, deep wood we would have seen in USA-made Gibsons only a few years ago. The Gibson LP Standard does still use quality rosewood for its fretboard, at least for now.

For the Studio Gibson experimented with a granadillo fingerboard for 2013. What the heck is granadillio? I had to look it up, but apparently it is a pretty decent rosewood substitute that has many of the same characteristics. Gibson had also been trying baked maple as a rosewood substitute.

Thankfully, they've moved back to rosewood, so you can expect the same great fretboard from a Les Paul Studio and you'd see in the Standard version. But what if you're thinking of an older model?

History will be the judge when it comes to some of these tonewood experiments Gibson has been conducting over the past few years. However, if they didn’t think it sounded good they wouldn’t use it, and players seem happier with the granadillo fingerboards than they were with baked maple. In my opinion, I’d prefer the more direct rosewood substitute of granadillio over baked maple. Baked maple seemed a little too bright for a Les Paul.

2017 Gibson Les Paul Standard T
2017 Gibson Les Paul Standard T

Pickups and Electronics

The Gibson Les Paul Studio T has a pair of classic Gibson pickups, the 490R and 498T set. The Standard now employs Burstbucker Pro pickups. Is this an upgrade? Gibson says so, but I’d call it a draw. The 490r/498Ts are classic tone machines in their own right, and I don’t think they take a backseat to the Burstbuckers.

Both pickup sets are going to get you that fat, thick Gibson tone you’re looking for, and both have the clarity and punch for leads, rhythm and whatever else you plan to do to your guitar. Personally, I have a Les Paul with Burstbuckers and I love it. But, I never had any complaints about the 490R/498T set.

With the basic Epiphone Les Paul Standard you’ll get a pair of Epiphone Alnico Classic humbuckers. These are good pickups on a guitar in this price range, but they don’t hold a candle to either Gibson set. This doesn’t make Epiphone bad. It’s just another example of how USA-made Gibsons shine.

However, higher-end Epiphones like the Les Paul PlusTop PRO and Les Paul Custom PRO feature upgraded ProBucker pickups. In my opinion, while not on par with Gibson pickups, they are head and shoulders above the old Alnico Classics.

Gibson had some interesting things going on with the electronics for the 2013-2015 Les Paul Standard, namely coil spitting, reverse-phase, and pure bypass that skips the tone shaping and sends your signal straight from the pickups to the output jack. This means the Studio and the Epiphone are both more straight-forward when it comes to electronics, and depending on what you’re looking for that could be a good thing.

But be aware that there are two versions of many Gibson Les Pauls for 2017: The HP version that features all of the cutting-edge ideas they've put out over the past few years, and the T version with more traditional appointments. In my opinion, I'm thrilled to see these more basic T-model guitars, as Gibson seemed to be getting a bit carried away!

The Epiphone Les Paul Standard PlusTop PRO


So which sounds better, the Standard or the Studio? Can you tell them apart? Sound and tone are such subjective things. I can tell you, personally, I hear no difference between the Les Paul Studio and Standard. Other players might disagree. Instead of taking my word for it, or anyone else's for that matter, decide for yourself. Listen to the two clips from Gibson on the right and you tell me: Is there any difference, and if so which sounds better?

How about the Epiphone? You already know it isn't going to sound as good as a Gibson, but is it passable? Again the answer to this question depends on the taste of the player. To me, the Epiphone Les Paul sounds better than just passable. It's a good-sounding guitar, but it's just not fair to compare it to a Gibson.

The main difference I hear with an Epi is lack of clarity, especially in lower notes. We're back to tonewoods, and that maple cap that helps keep the mahogany from getting boomy on the low end. But Epiphones definitely don't sound bad, and for the price their sound is a bargain.

Hear the Gibson Les Paul Standard


The Gibson Les Paul Standard is a beautiful guitar. The point of the Les Paul Studio was to skip a lot of the fancy parts of the Standard and bring down the price. That’s why they call it the Studio—because you use it in the studio where nobody knows you’re playing an ugly guitar, and you save your pretty Les Paul Standard for the stage.

The Les Paul Studio forgoes the binding around the body and the fretboard. You’ll find Gibson’s speed knobs instead of the traditional Les Paul controls. Most Studios do not have the pretty translucent maple tops you’ll find on Standards, instead using less-pretty maple and a solid color finish.

As it turns out the Les Paul Studio is definitely not an ugly guitar, and many players (myself included) find them downright gorgeous. An Alpine White or Ebony Les Paul Studio with chrome hardware makes for a great-looking instrument. It may not be a classic Les Paul, but it still looks pretty sharp..

How about Epiphone? The Epiphone Les Paul goes out of its way to look good, and hopefully that will help you forget it’s not a Gibson. It does a fine job at it, too, employing much cheaper methods of getting the Gibson Les Paul Standard look.

Epiphones are pretty guitars, and the average person will not know the difference between an Epi LP Standard and a Gibson. They’ll just know you’re playing a guitar that looks like other guitars they see on TV. That’s exactly what Epiphone is going for, and a big part of what makes the Epiphone Les Paul Standard such an outstanding value.

Les Paul Studio T

So you've made it this far, and maybe you’ve even decided by now which Les Paul you need to get. Maybe you've decided you can’t stand anything but a real Les Paul Standard. Maybe you’ve chosen to save your cash for a Gibson down the road, and grab an Epiphone now. Or, maybe you’ve chosen the Les Paul Studio, the middle option that will give you the best value for your money.

Just when you think you have it all figured out, here’s one more idea Gibson is going to throw at you. There is a brand-new Gibson Les Paul for 2017, and you can get one for just a little more than you’d pay for an Epiphone.

It’s called the Faded T, and it is a real made-in-the-USA Gibson. It’s a similar idea to a Les Paul Studio, but with even more basic finishes, appointments and hardware. It has a maple top on a mahogany back, a maple neck, a rosewood fretboard, and pair of 490R/T pickups.

A real Gibson Les Paul for around $800 is an incredible deal, and reviews for this guitar are extremely positive so far. While it has all the hallmarks of a Les Paul when it comes to sound and feel, it's really nice that it was so easy on the wallet.

The Les Paul Faded T is a great addition to the Les Paul lineup, and a great way for players on a budget to land a real Gibson.

Gibson Les Paul Faded T 2017
Gibson Les Paul Faded T 2017

How to Choose Your New Les Paul

So how do you pick between the Gibson Les Paul Studio, Standard, Faded and the Epiphone Les Paul? If you have the cash, your decision is made. Of course you need to go with the Les Paul Standard. If you really have the cash, go for the Les Paul Custom. The Custom is the ace in the Les Paul lineup, but that’s a subject for another time.

If you’re looking to grab a real Gibson at the lowest cost possible, go for the Les Paul Faded. It’s a huge step above an Epiphone for a relatively little difference in cash. I’m excited to see where this guitar goes from here, and, honestly, I'm about ready to see if I can’t grab one for myself. In time, it may unseat the Studio as the best Les Paul you can get for the money.

Until then, the best value, I say once more, is the Studio. It’s a beautiful guitar that sounds incredible, and comes at a cost of half of what a Standard goes for. It’s a great deal, and has become a classic based on its own merits.

Then there is Epiphone. The Epi LP Standard is a great guitar for the money, but not in the same league as a Gibson. The Epi Les Paul Custom is a similar story, only prettier. If you are an intermediate player, or a hobbyist who has better things in life to spend money on besides guitars, there is absolutely nothing wrong with Epiphone. In many cases, the Epiphone Les Paul really is the best option.

You have choice to make: Gibson Les Paul Studio, Standard, Epiphone Les Paul Standard, or the new Gibson Les Paul Faded T? It’s a wonderful problem to have, and I hope this article helped you choose.

The Best Les Paul?

Which Les Paul Do You Think Offers the Best Value?

See results

More Guitar:

Read more about Gibson and the amazing Les Paul!

Epiphone: The Best Alternative to the Gibson Les Paul

  • To many guitarists, the Epiphone Les Paul is as close as you can get to a real Gibson while keeping your budget in check. But as you'll see in this article there are a few other contenders that will scratch that Les Paul itch for under a grand.

Gibson Electric Guitars History

  • Read about the legacy of Gibson electric guitars and discover what has made instruments like the Les Paul, SG, Flying V and Explorer legendary in the guitar world. There is a reason so many guitar companies compare themselves to Gibson!

Gibson Les Paul LPJ Review

  • Check out the Gibson Les Paul LPJ, the most affordable way to grab a real USA-made Gibson Les Paul. It may cut corners to save you a few bucks, but it's a Gibson through and through.


    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    • Guitar Gopher profile image

      Guitar Gopher 5 months ago

      @Eli1109: If you have the budget there is nothing wrong with starting out on a Gibson Les Paul Studio. It's an awesome guitar - sounds amazing and easy to play. No setup headaches as with with a guitar with a complicated bridge, which is a good thing for beginners. A little heavy, but not a big deal.

      The reason I typically recommend guitars in the $200 - $300 range is because most beginners aren't willing or able to plunk down $1500 on a first guitar.

      But if you can, go for it! It's a great guitar.

    • profile image

      Eli1109 5 months ago

      Hi. I know in the end is up to anyone's personal taste and budget. However, I would like to ask, would you recommend a Gibson Les Paul Studio for someone who has never played a guitar or any other instrument and would like to learn?

    • Guitar Gopher profile image

      Guitar Gopher 10 months ago

      Hi Chibson. Aside from aesthetics (binding, colors, knobs, etc) the most notable difference there is the open-coil humbuckers. Same pickups, but open-coils tend to be a sound a little hotter and perhaps brighter. Hope you're loving your new guitar!

    • profile image

      chibson 10 months ago

      I have a Les Paul Tribute Gold top 2016. I find this to be a wonderful guitar for the money. Got mine at 100 off just cause of the 2017 models. I recommend it but what is the difference between it and a studio model.

    • Guitar Gopher profile image

      Guitar Gopher 14 months ago

      Hi CyberReLoad: I hear a lot of people say that about tonewoods, and I just can't agree. I know there are people who claim to have done experiments, but I'm going to continue to trust my ears. I think the wood is a very important ingredient in the sound of both acoustic and electric guitars.

    • profile image

      CyberReLoad 14 months ago

      the tone wood debate is dead. solid body eletric guitars sound aint caused nor affected by wood, its about everything else, the construction, the placement of pups/brigde/etc. WillsEasyGuitar and Scott Grove on youtube have done pretty good debunking of tone wood and eletric solid body guitars.

      i use to belive in tone wood, hence the whole reason i wanted a les paul back in the day. now i have a les paul and i love it and play it every day but i know now the sounds characteristic aint comming from the wood but the design of everything else..

    • Guitar Gopher profile image

      Guitar Gopher 15 months ago

      Hi Rick. I just wrote a post last week about this very subject. IMO, tonewoods definitely DO matter. Here are my full thoughts:

    • profile image

      Rick Herron 15 months ago

      Something is wrong here. From what I've read, Tone-woods themselves, scientifically do not add to the tonal character of an electric solid-body guitar. The premise of this review is wrong unless it can be proven otherwise. It is acoustic guitars that can suffer. Construction has other significant advantages, disadvantages. This argument has been raging for years and that is why on solid bodies like Fender Strats and Teles, changing out the electronic, pickups and hardware has allowed for the creation so many Partscaster.

    • Guitar Gopher profile image

      Guitar Gopher 23 months ago

      Hi TTC12! I owned several Studios of that era and I agree there were great guitars. They changed the design a few years ago, but for 2016 it looks like they've gone back to many of the features that made that guitars so amazing.

    • TTC12 profile image

      TTC12 23 months ago

      my 2004 studio is an awesome guitar. I have owned Custom, Deluxes and Standards - the studio can hang with any of them. LPJ is a great one, too. Seriously want one of those.

    • Guitar Gopher profile image

      Guitar Gopher 2 years ago

      That's interesting, Pocono Foothills. I wonder if Gibson could give you some info if you shoot them an email.

    • pocono foothills profile image

      John Fisher 2 years ago from Easton, Pennsylvania

      I bought a Les Paul Studio in 1983. I have never seen one since that looks like the one that I have. I even tried to do a search on the Internet just to see if I could find a picture of one that looks like mine, and I couldn't find anything.

    • Guitar Gopher profile image

      Guitar Gopher 2 years ago

      Sound awesome CEe! Congrats on a great guitar!

    • profile image

      CEe 2 years ago

      I have a LP Studio Deluxe II in CaramelBurst....2013. A guy I know (who used to work at the Gibson Custom Shop) just did some work on it for me. He was surprised to see a flame top on it....after doing a set-up (including a bone nut), I put it up against a 2015 LP Classic. The guy with the classic offered $1500 on the spot (I paid $900).......I still have it :-)

    • Guitar Gopher profile image

      Guitar Gopher 3 years ago

      Perhaps, mpc. The subject of what really lurks under the hood of an Epi LP is oft debated. Epi says Lp Standards have maple tops, so that works for me. However, they surely are not the thick, carved maple caps you'd find on a Gibson. Unless maybe you're talking about upper-level Epis.

      IMP, this is all the more reason to play a guitar you love and not worry about specs and reputation.

    • profile image

      mpc 3 years ago

      You're mistaken! Some Epi Les Pauls have a carved maple top!

    Show All Categories