"St. Anger 2015" Diehard Fans Re-Record Metallica's Most Misunderstood Album

Updated on May 24, 2018
FatFreddysCat profile image

I've been an obsessed hard rock/heavy metal fan and CD collector since the early 1980s. If it's got a good guitar riff and attitude, I'm in.

Source

#STANGER2015

In early January 2015, an interesting YouTube clip started making the rounds on Facebook, as well as on various metalhead forums I hang out on: St. Anger 2015, a freshly re-recorded version of Metallica's mostly-hated 2003 release St. Anger, performed by two very talented fanboys who took it upon themselves to re-create the album "from the ground up," with cleaner and tighter production values, in the hopes that Metallica fans might give the songs on St. Anger a fresh listen and re-evaluate what is still a very controversial record. So how does it stack up against the original? Very impressively, in this old-fart Metallica fan's opinion.

Source

So Who Are These Guys, Anyway?

The guys behind #STANGER2015 (yes, that's apparently the official name for this project, hashtag and all) are Daryl Gardner and Dave Cox and they hail from Birmingham, U.K. Daryl is a member of an alternative metal band called Grace The Skies, while Dave is in a band called Adjust. (Don't feel bad if you've never heard of'em; I hadn't, either.) The multi-talented Daryl performed all the guitars, bass and drums on the St. Anger re-recording, while Dave did all of the lead vocals. The session was produced by Daryl's Grace the Skies bandmate Chris Dando, who also contributed backing vocals.

As a long time Metallica fan who abso-lutely-freakin' HATED St. Anger when it first hit the streets in 2003, my first reaction when I heard of this re-recording was "why would anybody want to bother trying to 'improve' that album?" As far as I was concerned, no amount of studio polish could possibly salvage the songs on St. Anger, which remains Metallica's least essential album.

Curiosity eventually got the better of me, however, and after heading to YouTube to give it a couple of spins, I had to give credit where credit's due: these guys really did do a nice job. While the #STANGER2015 re-recording is essentially a note-for-note "cover version" of the entire album, the production is much cleaner, and since they also wisely cut out some of the repetitive fat from the original arrangements "2015" actually clocks in at 15 minutes shorter than the meandering original album. In other words, the whole thing is a much more focused and far less irritating listening experience than the "real" St. Anger album...which is quite a feat!

It should be noted that Daryl and Dave undertook this project strictly for fun, with no intentions of cashing in. There will be no CD release or digital download for these tunes, and you won't find them on streaming services like Spotify, either; they will only be available for listening via YouTube. The video went live on YouTube on January 13, 2015 and racked up nearly 600,000 views in just a few days. Reviews and comments have been overwhelmingly positive, with many fans saying they prefer this version to Metallica's original. You can count me as one of those fans!

#STANGER2015 Full Album Re-Recorded

Anger Management

When it was first released in 2003, St. Anger, quickly became the most hotly debated album of Metallica's career. As the documentary film Some Kind of Monster (2004) showed, St. Anger was created during a time of utter turmoil within the Metallica camp, when interpersonal relationships between the musicians were at their absolute lowest. First, long time bassist Jason Newsted exited the band in 2001, citing an oppressive work environment where his attempts at songwriting contributions were either belittled or ignored entirely. Guitarist/vocalist James Hetfield then entered rehab to deal with his alcohol addiction in the midst of pre-production for the record, leaving drummer Lars Ulrich and guitarist Kirk Hammett behind to noodle around in the studio as a duo and wonder if Metallica even still existed. In short, Metallica had no business even trying to make a new album under such circumstances. Nonetheless, once Hetfield was released from rehab, producer Bob Rock took over the bass playing duties for recording purposes, and they bashed out the songs that became St. Anger in a series of increasingly tense recording sessions that often found them at each other's throats. It took intervention from the band's management and regular therapy sessions with "performance coach" Phil Towle to help Metallica get their personal you-know-what together enough for them to complete the album and then out on tour to support it (with new bassist Robert Trujillo, who was hired after St. Anger was recorded, in tow).

Metallica - "St. Anger" (2003)

Hear the Original:

My "Anger" Experience

Prior to St. Anger's June 2003 release, the internet was lit up with supposed "studio reports" filed by European "journalists" of dubious credibility, all of whom claimed that the new material was "thrashier than ever" and predicting it would be "the heaviest Metallica album yet." I can remember tuning into MTV for the world premiere of the title track's music video a week or two before the album's street date and thinking that it certainly wasn't the best thing I'd ever heard from Metallica, but the aggressive riffing showed promise. My Metallica fanaticism had been on a downhill slide for much of the previous decade anyway so I was trying to keep my expectations low, hoping that I'd be pleasantly surprised.

...I didn't keep them low enough, as it turned out, because when I finally got a copy of the CD on the release date, St. Anger was damn near unlistenable. These were not "songs," they were sloppy, under-produced odds and ends that had seemingly been thrown into a blender and then strung together half-assedly in Pro-Tools. This thing didn't even sound like the band members had ever been together in the same hemisphere, much less the same recording studio, at any time during the album's creation. Bob Rock's production sounded like a cheap demo tape, and Lars Ulrich's drum sound (which sounds like he's banging on pots and pans with a wooden spoon) quickly achieved the quality of Chinese Water Torture after only a few songs. I spent a week or so re-playing St. Anger and hoping it would eventually "click," before I finally gave up and admitted that I was beating a dead horse. I wrote a scathing review of the disc for my friend's e-zine (where I opined that the CD "stunk like a fish market in the middle of July" - ouch, that'll show 'em!) and declared myself officially finished with Metallica. A good friend of mine, who'd been holding off on buying the CD till he had a chance to hear my thoughts on it, asked me if I could burn him a copy of the disc soon afterward and I said "Y'know what? F*ck it, you can HAVE this damn thing," and sent it to him in Texas, where I assume it now sits on a shelf at his place collecting dust. (haha)

That was a dozen years ago now and it was the last time I gave any of the songs from St. Anger the time of day... until #STANGER2015 came along!

"Some Kind of Monster" (2004) Documentary Trailer:

Don't get me wrong, the #ST.ANGER2015 recording hasn't totally changed my opinion of the much-maligned album..it's still kind of a mess, but at least in this form it's a more listenable, less antagonizing mess. There are still some songs that are downright weak, like "Shoot Me Again" and the silly "Sweet Amber" ("how sweet are yoooooooouu?") but even these benefit from Daryl and Dave's new paint job. The most important difference between the 2003 and 2015 takes on Anger is the drum sound - on ST. ANGER 2015 they sound like actual drums, whereas on the original album they sounded like Lars Ulrich was randomly firing a BB gun into a coffee can. I also must give props to Dave for his amazingly Hetfield-esque vocal work. Seriously, if you played this for a casual Metallica listener and didn't tell them that it wasn't James, I doubt they'd notice any difference. Naturally, the cleaned-up production makes the few St. Anger songs that I actually *did* sort of like back in the day - namely "Frantic," the title track, "Invisible Kid" and "Some Kind of Monster" - sound even better.

In the past three days I've probably listened to ST. ANGER 2015 more than I ever listened to the original album back in the day, and that's the highest praise that I can give it. I wonder if the Metallica guys have heard it, because it would be interesting to hear their impressions of this fan-driven homage. Nice work fellas!!

© 2015 Keith Abt

Comments

    0 of 8192 characters used
    Post Comment

    • profile image

      Look, I'll be honest, 

      2 months ago

      I'm a Megadeth fan, and I can't stand the base emotion found in Metallica. I respect Metallica, but I think they've gotten lazy since Metallica (1991). Their release schedule, averaging at around 1 per 6 years in the modern time frame, is simply a middle finger to the fans.

      The only Metallica album I can stand for more than 2 or 3 songs is St. Anger. I have no idea why. Maybe it's because it sounds nothing like Metallica, maybe because it's so emotionally honest and chaotic. Maybe it's the trash can. I don't know.

      Thank you for listening to my TED talk.

    • FatFreddysCat profile imageAUTHOR

      Keith Abt 

      3 years ago from The Garden State

      Hi Jeff... yeah, these guys really did improve on the original. I guess the old saying is wrong...you *can* polish a turd! (haha)

    • profile image

      Jeff Rutter 

      3 years ago

      After hearing the song St. Anger and the (lack) of production and the absolutely horrible snare (which is the loudest thing on the album I assume), I never bothered to listen to anything else from this album.

      Hearing this version of it for the first time, I'm realizing the potential of this album could have been frickin' awesome. Of all the Metallica albums I've listened to (and I've "heard em all" -see what I did there? -) This one had some killer hooks and riffs different from the "usual" metallica material. I think (this version) of "My World" is my new favorite metallica song. I'm afraid to hear the original version of it for fear that it'll make me hate this version as well.

      Finally, this is the first time I've heard anything from this album other than the song St. Anger. What a bummer ... this album could have really kicked ass.

    • FatFreddysCat profile imageAUTHOR

      Keith Abt 

      3 years ago from The Garden State

      Hi Snakesmum - I don't think we're alone in our dislike of St. Anger - it's pretty much universally hated by the band's fanbase, haha.

      ...although its ranking probably went up a few notches after Metallica did "LuLu," their disastrous collaboration with the late Lou Reed, a couple of years ago... "Wow, St. Anger doesn't sound so bad next to this thing!" (haha)

    • profile image

      Snakesmum 

      3 years ago

      Good to find someone who didn't like St Anger. My copy is on the shelf gathering dust - I hated the whole thing.

    • FatFreddysCat profile imageAUTHOR

      Keith Abt 

      3 years ago from The Garden State

      Hi darkprince -- I traded off my copy of "St. Anger" years ago so I haven't heard it since it was a new release. The drum sound was just so damned irritating, it overpowered everything else. That was the main thing I liked about this re-recording, the drums actually sound like real drums, not someone banging on pots and pans, haha.

    • profile image

      darkprinceofjazz 

      3 years ago

      I decided to give the original another go. It doesn't sound as bad as I remember, also the thrash element is also much more prevalent than I remember. I distinctly remember that snare drum driving me nuts then, and it still does. I think the thing that turned me off was the pretentiousness of the album, no solos! I felt robbed not hearing those fantastically blues drenched Hammet solos.

      I like experimentation and even accepted the more commercial Load Reload stuff, which sounds pretty darn good 20 years later, funny how many bands sounds like that style today.

      I wonder if Lars would consider re-doing the drum track, or re-recording the drums all together? I just can't get past that horrific sound.

    • FatFreddysCat profile imageAUTHOR

      Keith Abt 

      3 years ago from The Garden State

      Hi Sparkster - yeah, this was a pretty neat idea. I understand that the guys who re-did the album have heard from the Metallica camp and have gotten a thumbs up for their hard work, that's gotta be pretty cool.

    • sparkster profile image

      Sparkster Publishing 

      3 years ago from United Kingdom

      I didn't realize this had been done. There's a few albums out there I wouldn't mind doing this with (and have considered doing but there's not really any point).

    • FatFreddysCat profile imageAUTHOR

      Keith Abt 

      3 years ago from The Garden State

      Cool, Lady G. -- if you checked out the "St. Anger" re-do, what did you think?

    • Lady Guinevere profile image

      Debra Allen 

      3 years ago from West By God

      Nice hub about a band that I listen to lots. I like the songs mostly from the Black Album. Nothing Else Matters kept me going through and after my divorce and then I also like Enter Sandman, Unforgiven and a few others.

    working

    This website uses cookies

    As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, spinditty.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

    For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://spinditty.com/privacy-policy#gdpr

    Show Details
    Necessary
    HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
    LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
    Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
    AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
    HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
    Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
    CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
    Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
    Features
    Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
    Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
    Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
    PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
    MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
    Marketing
    Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
    Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
    Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
    Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
    Statistics
    Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
    ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
    Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)